As a fact that class jdk.internal.joptsimple.internal.Strings does exist, I don't think we shall add a class named Strings. That will be misleading sometimes.
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> 于2019年6月5日周三 上午12:32写道： > > The JDK is the only source allowed to modify java.lang.String, so > they'd likely add static methods to that directly like String.join() > and the others. The plural name thing was more of an issue with an > interface Thing and utility class Things. As of Java 8, there's > typically no need to have a Things class because the Thing interface > can have static methods on it. For example, see all the static methods > added to Comparator that would have typically gone into a class named > Comparators (like Collector/Collectors). > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 06:07, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Then 10 years later JDK has its own Strings, and users get confused then. > > > > Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> 于2019年6月4日周二 下午6:58写道： > > > > > Le 28/05/2019 à 13:46, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Maybe we could make a more ambitious 'Strings' class with methods taken > > > from StringUtils and refactored with a fluent API to avoid the > > > combinatorial explosion of StringUtils? Just a wild idea. > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
