I see no reason to update to Java 8 unless continuing with Java 7 becomes a big hassle.
Why penalise people stuck on Java 7 unnecessarily? On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 15:31, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That seems reasonable. > > > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:23 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This comes up from time to time and I can only offer my usual "if you want > > support for a dead version of Java, feel free to provide a PR" We can > > always provide 1.12.1 for Java 7 security fixes or other fixes deemed > > important enough. > > > > Gary > > > >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:20 AM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1, but there are considerable projects out there that would want us to > >> maintain backwards compatibility with Java 7. > >> > >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Now that Codec 1.12 is out, I plan on updating from Java 7 to Java 8. > >>> > >>> Gary > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
