stain commented on issue #53: COMMONSRDF-80: Bumping Jena version 3.5.0 => 3.9.0 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/53#issuecomment-451450510 It is not as ideal, as it would make `commons-rdf-jena` as a Maven package no longer be a sufficient OSGi dependency by itself, as `jena-arq` is not an OSGi package (for some reason). But I understand it would make it easier for anyone using the regular `jena-arq` dependencies together with Commons RDF to avoid duplication (particularly if you get different versions of Jena). I think for the OSGi dependencies to be calculated correct for `commons-rdf-jena` we need to then still list `jena-osgi` as an `<optional>` dependency. While the ideal solution would be for `jena-arq` etc. to be OSGi packages themselves (avoiding need for `jena-osgi` overall) I'm OK with the above solution for `commons-rdf-jena`. OSGi users would simply need to ignore `jena-arq` and add `jena-osgi`, we can document that.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
