On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 08:11:03 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:47 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand this discussion. Changes in Commons Parent have
broken
the commons-compress build. So we should either roll this changes
back or
those who need the changes in commons parent should fix the commons
compress build.
I think the problem at hand here is that we, across our projects, are
inconsistent with our usage of componentId, so naturally any changes
to the way we consume it in the parent are breaking changes. For
example:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/blob/master/pom.xml#L573
<https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/blob/master/pom.xml#L573>
This one is wrong, according to a convention explicitly mentioned
in some POM files, e.g.:
---CUT---
<!-- Do not change: "rng" is the name of the component even if the
name of the base package evolves with major release numbers
(see "commons.osgi.symbolicName", below). -->
<commons.componentid>rng</commons.componentid>
---CUT---
Gilles
versus
https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/blob/master/pom.xml#L487
<https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/blob/master/pom.xml#L487>
-Rob
Regards,
Benedikt
Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 19:08 Uhr schrieb Gary Gregory <
garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:27 AM Stefan Bodewig
<bode...@apache.org>
wrote:
On 2018-08-16, Gary Gregory wrote:
I've use the release plugin a bunch without trouble. You might
want to
see
how other POMs are configured, for example [dbcp].
The same way as Compress (no commons- prefix), I've got no idea
why
running site-deploy should work for it.
You use the release plugin if you only want to publish the site
and not
cut a release?
I use the plugin build the dist folder (which includes a site) and
generate
the vote email text. For the real site, after the vote, I use the
stock
site-deploy goal.
You have to keep in mind that components like Collections, Lang,
Pool,
and
DBCP, the folder name is different from the artifact id because
the
artifact id contains a major version number, for example
commons-lang
is
the folder but commons-lang3 is the AID.
The parent POM says about componentId:
<!-- The Commons Component id is substring of the package name
from
o.a.commons.(.*)., for example:
- Use dbcp2 instead of dbcp.
- Use collections4 instead of collections.
- Use lang3 instead of lang.
is this no longer true and it should be commons-lang instead of
lang by
now?
The comments are misleading:
<!-- The Commons Component id is used on the distribution
server, for
example:
- Use dbcp instead of dbcp2.
- Use collections instead of collections4.
- Use lang instead of lang3.
- Use pool instead of pool2.
- and so on...
-->
<commons.componentid>${project.artifactId}</commons.componentid>
<!-- The Commons Component id is substring of the package name
from
o.a.commons.(.*)., for example:
- Use dbcp2 instead of dbcp.
- Use collections4 instead of collections.
- Use lang3 instead of lang.
- Use pool2 instead of pool.
- and so on...
-->
<commons.packageId>${project.artifactId}</commons.packageId>
For the seconds comment it should read
<!-- The package id is substring of the package name from
o.a.commons.(.*)., for example:
See the Commons Pool POM as an example.
Gary
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
