On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:50:11 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 9, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:27:16 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
Hello Rob.
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:44:16 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
@Gilles - thoughts here?? Just kinda what I was thinking, but I’m
only a +0 on this change. So, if you want to revert it before
going up
with 1.1, that’s fine.
I don't understand this change after what I answered to Gary's
strange
proposal.
The comment is *wrong*. As I said previously, the base class
provides
boiler-plate code; that is *not* deprecated. The issue is that
those
methods were not meant to be used further down the hierarchy (in
user's
subclasses). [And now, furthermore, they are not used anymore in
class
"PoissonSampler", following the change in RNG-50 (delegation to
other
classes).]
The sampler classes should have been made "final"; but now, this
change
would also be "breaking" (even though I doubt about legitimate
use-cases
for inherithing from the sampler implementations).
My goal was to have the class look like is has the same
functionality
at 1.0, but instead accommodate for local javadoc changes
to point out what the user should be doing. That said, it’s
entirely
possible that I wasn’t precise enough with the “@deprecated”
messaging
due to lack of familiarity with the issue at hand.
It is however unclear to me how these changes would be breaking as
the methods exposed on the class don’t change signature or
accessibility quantifier, but I could have overlooked something.
?
I'm saying that the appropriate change (that is: make the sampler
classes "final") would be breaking BC (in the sense that Clirr will
report errors). However, users of this library most probably
wouldn't use it so as to be impacted by the change (that is: their
code will work as with 1.0).
Right, but we’re stuck not being able to make the appropriate change
for 1.1. So we have to find the next best thing, and I’m just poking
around trying to find anything that works in that category.
We would be stuck only if the goal is to produce a clean report
rather than to provide a good library. Cf. other post sent a
few moments ago.
Regards,
Gilles
Regardless, it was just an idea, and I figured the easiest way to
make a proposal was to push a commit up. Like I said I’m a +0 on
it,
and if
we come up with a better mechanism, then I’m on board with that.
Cheers,
-Rob
Please revert.
Thanks,
Gilles
-Rob
On Aug 8, 2018, at 12:42 PM, chtom...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: commons-rng
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/1.1 50b984b1d -> f8159f28a
Adding PoissonSampler deprecations. Use the correct faster
public methods
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/commit/f8159f28
Tree:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/tree/f8159f28
Diff:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/diff/f8159f28
Branch: refs/heads/1.1
Commit: f8159f28a52197d0e7b55e39b115702147cf57a0
Parents: 50b984b
Author: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
Authored: Wed Aug 8 12:42:45 2018 -0400
Committer: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com>
Committed: Wed Aug 8 12:42:45 2018 -0400
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.../sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java | 42
++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng/blob/f8159f28/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git
a/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
b/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
index d0733ba..29d0e4e 100644
---
a/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
+++
b/commons-rng-sampling/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rng/sampling/distribution/PoissonSampler.java
@@ -67,6 +67,48 @@ public class PoissonSampler
return poissonSampler.sample();
}
+ /**
+ * @return a random value from a uniform distribution in
the
+ * interval {@code [0, 1)}.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link
PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+ * as it is considerably faster.
+ */
+ @Deprecated
+ protected double nextDouble() {
+ return super.nextDouble();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @return a random {@code int} value.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link
PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+ * as it is considerably faster.
+ */
+ @Deprecated
+ protected int nextInt() {
+ return super.nextInt();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @param max Upper bound (excluded).
+ * @return a random {@code int} value in the interval
{@code [0, max)}.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link
PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+ * * as it is considerably faster.
+ */
+ @Deprecated
+ protected int nextInt(int max) {
+ return super.nextInt(max);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @return a random {@code long} value.
+ * @deprecated - one should be using the {@link
PoissonSampler#sample()} method,
+ * * as it is considerably faster.
+ */
+ @Deprecated
+ protected long nextLong() {
+ return super.nextLong();
+ }
+
/** {@inheritDoc} */
@Override
public String toString() {
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
