On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:24 -0700, Bindul Bhowmik wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
Hi.

On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:51:43 -0500, Matt Benson wrote:

I have often thought about creating a utility class that allows me to
write
skeletal code that still compiles but will remind me to go back and finish it. This is a weird meta area of programming, but here are some basic
usage
examples:

Foo foo = Todo.todo(); //returns null
Bar bar = Todo.todo(THROWING_EXCEPTION); //throws NotImplementedException Baz baz = Todo.todo(RETURNING_NULL, "create a Baz"); //returns null and
prints a message to System.err

I would also think it a good (if odd) idea to make the whole class
deprecated so that its use is flagged in tools, etc.

Does the community think this code would be suited to the commons-lang
component?


Perhaps "Commons Testing".
IIUC, such calls are not meant to appear in released code.

I would recommend against commons testing. i would assume that
component would be a dependency with a test scope in most projects,
making it impossible to use it in the main code.

That is the feature: when about to release, all "Commons Testing"
modules must be in "test" scope, and if they are used in "main",
compilation will fail.
In development, "main" would depend on "Commons Testing" to allow
usage of "Todo".

Gilles

Regards,
Bindul



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to