> On Feb 20, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:22:11 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin]
>> working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom
>> changes.
> 
> RNG's POM?

Yeah. I’m getting assemblies for each sub component. And i wanted to add the 
dist sub-project as a module in hopes of having “mvn deploy” doing the whole 
release. But, doing that causes things like checkstyle to get curried into the 
dist project. 

> 
>> But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1.
> 
> Perhaps better create a branch for testing (?).
> 
>> So
>> I’ll do that after you send it up and out.
> 
> It can wait a few more days... :-)
> 
> Gilles
> 
>> -Rob
>> 
>>> On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including
>>> examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>> On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>> Does it make sense to exclude the
>>> commons-rng-examples
>>> module from the distribution?
>>> 
>>> Gilles
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ping?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>>>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>>>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>>>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>>>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>>>>> "Java" module)?  [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>>>>> build fails").
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>>>>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>>>>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>>>>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>>>>> be wrong).
>>>>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>>>>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>>>>> wrt v1.1).
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
>>>> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
>>>> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
>>>> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>>>> 
>>>> Review welcome.
>>>> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>>>> 
>>>> Gilles
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>> 
>>>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>>>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>>>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to