> On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:49:52 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 3:05 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:27:53 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>>>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:17:18 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>>>>> Which should be the template multi-module project? They all have >>>>>> subtle differences that lead to different nuances to the build. >>>>> >>>>> Which differences did you spot? >>>> >>>> Nothing of any particular consequence, just where the main assemblies >>>> end up. Or which Pom they’re in. >>> >>> What do you mean by "main assemblies"? If it's the "full" >>> distribution, then is it a matter of naming the output directory? >>> It could be configurable. >>> >>> For the config, the main POM looks the appropriate place if it can >>> be done without side-effects. [For RNG I created a separate directory >>> because I was not sure how to do it.] >> >> Right….that’s why I was asking which project would be the best >> standard to work from, and then I could go through and take all of the >> other multi-module builds and mildly refactor the pom/directory >> structure to align with which ever we decided was standard. >> >> Is [jcs] the right choice as the standard? > > Why this one rather than another? > It's not clear what you are looking for.
It really doesn’t matter too much to me, I just wanted to get a community consensus on what we think a standard directory structure should be, or the exemplar multimodule commons project. It’s just easier to work from a specific project as opposed to trying to generalize immediately. So my thought right now is either [rng] or [jcs]. I suppose another thought could be: is anyone planning a release on a commons multi-module project anytime soon? If so which? -Rob > From what I see wrt the creation of "full dist" artefacts, the > difference with e.g. [RNG] is that in [jcs], there is a maven > module, with no code, while for [RNG], there is a directory > (not a maven module), but both contain a POM whose only purpose > is to provide an "assembly" config. > > Having no idea on how to achieve it, I'd wish that creating > the "full dist" only requires a custom "goal" like (?) > $ mvn package:dist > with no ad-hoc directory/module: all modules specified in the > top POM would have their artefacts (recursively) bundled into > <component>-dist-<version>.tar.gz > > Regards, > Gilles > >> Cheers, >> -Rob >> >>> >>> Gilles >>> >>>>>> I >>>>>> figure we pick one and make that the standard multi-module build >>>>>> paradigm and fit the others into it. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Rob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@commons.apache.org>
