On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:23:04 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Gilles
<gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:34:55 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
I find myself writing a lot of this kind of code:
if (SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtLeast(JavaVersion.JAVA_1_8)) ...
and
Assume.assumeTrue(SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtLeast(JavaVersi
on.JAVA_1_8));
I think this would be more tidy:
if (SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtLeast8()) ...
If this makes your skin crawl, please present a (technical)
argument
against it...
Gary
Can't you do something like
if (JavaVersion.isAtLeast(JavaVersion.JAVA_1_8)) ...
That would not compile, there is no static JavaVersion.isAtLeast()
method.
I rephrase:
Isn't it better (no bloating of a "Utils" class) to define a method
"isAtLeast" in class "JavaVersion" that would be used as the above?
Regards,
Gilles
Gary
?
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
