On 2 November 2017 at 05:24, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> The implementations should be almost identical since they derive from
> the same source. The key difference is that the Pool version exposes
> some internals that the JDK version does not. Unless the JDK provided
> implementation has changed (and I don't think it has) replacement with
> the JDK version won't be possible unless we start using reflection to
> expose the necessary JDK internals - and that approach has its own set
> of risks.
>

In that case, I don't really see the point in using the JDK version.

-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to