> Am 16.10.2017 um 00:34 schrieb Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>:
> 
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:45:09 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> Assertion classes are just containers for static methods. Using "import
>> static" is the only way in Java to import the individual methods as if the
>> class itself were a package. Also, doing this is pretty common when using
>> the Assert class as all its methods are prefixed with "assert" anyways.
> 
> It's not because something is widespread that it should be emulated.
> Is there any good reason to use "import static"?  [Saving the typing
> of 7 characters cannot be one of them.]
> 
> It can (and does) happen that "assert..." methods are defined
> on a per project basis, and nothing is gained when the reader
> has to check the top of the file to be sure of what class is
> actually used.
> 
> My point was just that rather than cleaning up, the commit was
> obfuscating (even if so little) the source code.
> I prefer the other way around. :-)

I think there are pros and cons for both styles. I prefer static imports. I 
don’t see any value in knowing, that assertEquals comes from a class called 
Assert. 

Cheers,
Benedikt

> 
> YMMV,
> Gilles
> 
> 
>> On 15 October 2017 at 13:44, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 12:22:13 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Just for consistency.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Consistency is fine. ;-)
>>> 
>>> All almost all tests already used static
>>>> imports, so I adjusted the few that did not.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It's the use of "import static" which I was questioning.
>>> 
>>> Gilles
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -Pascal
>>>> 
>>>> Am 15.10.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Gilles:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:34:04 +0000 (UTC), pascalschumac...@apache.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Repository: commons-text
>>>>>> Updated Branches:
>>>>>>  refs/heads/master 51645b4f0 -> 8f7d0494d
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> always use static imports for assertion methods
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Why?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to