Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 10:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Le 5 sept. 2017 05:40, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On Sep 4, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> 
>> Le 4 sept. 2017 20:44, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> You don't duplicate any logging config. You can use both slf4j-api and
>> log4j-api with either logback or log4j2.
>> 
>> 
>> Except you dont always have the choice with 2 apis. It also messes up
>> logging lifecycle and setup which needs 2 integrations in the environment.
>> Whatever reason you use it is not free to switch and even if log4j2 is
>> awesome, it is far to be a first citizen api for a common library used in
> a
>> lot of contexts IMHO.
> 
> Now you have me curious about your last sentence. In you opinion, what is
> keeping Log4j2 from being a first citizen api for a common library? You
> didn’t mention SLF4J in that sentence so I am assuming you consider it to
> be one. Why?
> 
> 
> Purely usages as an api. Once again the fact I'm very cautious moving to
> log4j2 api is not about the quality of log4j2. Take most of asf project
> stacks and I guess slf4j, jul or even commons logging will be more used
> than log4j2 as an API. Side question: wonder if we can extract this stat
> through asf infra?
> 
> I hear the "if noone starts" side of the issue but it must be more global
> than just one lib by lib (a bit like when tomee needs to support one more
> java version and upgrades asm in openjpa, cxf, tomee, owb, ... at once).
> 

You can look at the download stats from repository.apache.org. You will see 
there are more downloads of the API than Log4J-core, but to be honest I have no 
idea what that means. I am just happy that the trend keeps going up.

What does it really matter if it used more (or less) as an API? What matters 
most is how well it works for you and your users. In addition, if you look at 
the Github and Jira stats you will see that Log4J has been far more active over 
the last few years, so you are much more likely to get better support.

Ralph


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to