> On Jun 22, 2017, at 4:38 AM, Amey Jadiye <ameyjad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 agreed with Emmanuel, better we park/close this issue for now. Its very > trivial and can be pull whenever there will be actual requirement. > > Regards, > Amey > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, 1:50 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Le 22/06/2017 à 06:28, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : >>> >>> But would be good to find someone, maybe a bioinformatician, that could >> confirm if it would be useful, and give a few use cases, for that. >> >> What about waiting for someone with an actual and sensible use case to >> request the inclusion of palindrome functions in [text] instead? If we >> try to include whatever text processing function we can imagine in >> [text], even if they aren't used, we'll end up with an oversized and >> bloated API. I think the development should be driven by actual needs >> and not by hypothetical usage.
I think I would take the tactic of searching across Apache code bases to see if such a functionality is written. If it's in two or more different projects then think about bringing it in? -Rob >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
