Agreed with Raymond +1 If we want to make things modular I would prefer core should have very core part of numbers in CN which were in Commons Math and already separated in from CM to CN, as Angle is the part of geometry the package for it should be like.
package some.pkg.geometry.core; IMHO PlaneAngle should be part of geometry. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Raymond DeCampo <r...@decampo.org> wrote: > My first thought is that adding geometry to commons-numbers is too much > "scope creep" for lack of a better term. There's a lot of code under the > org.apache.commons.math4.geometry package in CM. > > I guess I am wondering where we want to draw the line. Obviously we do not > want all of CM in numbers or we will be back where we started when we began > splitting it up. > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Please have a look at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-37 > > > > Comments, suggestions, objections? > > > > Regards, > > Gilles > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > -- ,Thanks _____________________ *Amey Jadiye* (+91 73 87 770 382)
