Yup, here it is: 13.4.15. Method Result Type Changing the result type of a method, or replacing a result type with void, or replacing void with a result type, has the combined effect of deleting the old method and adding a new method with the new result type or newly void result (see §13.4.12 <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.html#jls-13.4.12> ).
For purposes of binary compatibility, adding or removing a method or constructor m whose return type involves type variables (§4.4 <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.4>) or parameterized types (§4.5 <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.5>) is equivalent to the addition (respectively, removal) of the an otherwise equivalent method whose return type is the erasure (§4.6 <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.6>) of the return type of m. On 30 April 2017 at 15:30, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.html > > A reference to a method must be resolved at compile time to a symbolic > reference to the erasure (§4.6 > <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.6>) > of the qualifying type of the invocation, plus the erasure of the signature > (§8.4.2 > <https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-8.html#jls-8.4.2>) > of the method. > > I'm getting the impression here that the ABI follows the same rules as > using MethodHandle.invokeExact(). > > On 30 April 2017 at 15:21, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 30, 2017 1:19 PM, "Oliver Heger" <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> >> wrote: >> >> I think client code has to be recompiled, otherwise a NoSuchMethodError >> is thrown. >> >> >> >> Dang it. Are you sure? >> >> Gary >> >> >> Oliver >> >> Am 30.04.2017 um 21:24 schrieb Matt Sicker: >> > That sort of thing changes the binary signature, but source >> compatibility >> > is retained. >> > >> > On 30 April 2017 at 14:20, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Would it break BC to change StopWatch.stop() to return "this"? >> >> >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> -- >> >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1617290459/ref=as_li_ >> >> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1617290459& >> >> linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b >> 1af9fe6a2b8> >> >> >> >> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a= >> >> 1617290459> >> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_ >> >> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021& >> >> linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de4 >> 18%22 >> >>> >> >> >> >> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a= >> >> 1935182021> >> >> Spring Batch in Action >> >> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_ >> >> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951& >> >> linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B% >> >> 7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action> >> >> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a= >> >> 1935182951> >> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>