If they're not user-implemented interfaces, then changing them isn't really a backwards incompatible change.
On 13 March 2017 at 17:50, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 March 2017 at 20:12, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > The interface modifications are fixes to user enhancement requests: > > > > JEXL-211: Add callable method to JexlExpression interface > > JEXL-198: JxltEngine Template deos not expose pragmas > > JEXL-201: Allow Interpreter to use live values from JexlEngine.Option > > interface implemented by JexlContext > > > > Note again that these interfaces are *not* expected to be implemented by > > user code. > > I'm not sure I understand how that follows. > > If the JIRAs are enhancement requests for users, surely the intention > is to allow the users to make use of the new methods? > > That suggests that the users are currently using the interfaces. > > > The likelihood of any user implementing those and not filling > > enhancements requests or even asking questions in the Apache mailing > lists > > (or Stackoverflow) seems very small... > > Sorry, no idea what you mean by that. > > > Choice is please (the few) users using the library or stay true to a rule > > that protects no real usage in this case. I wish this was seen as an easy > > choice for the community. > > Nor that. > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414. > n4.nabble.com/jexl-3-1-release-review-tp4691513p4696492.html > > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
