On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:41:59 +0000, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of
dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages
within a
single module would be better.
Indeed, the proposal was with an eye towards differing dependency
requirements:
* formatting/parsing of "Complex" would depend on the module
"commons-numbers-complex"
* formatting/parsing of "Fraction" would depend on the module
"commons-numbers-fraction"
while none of the functionality that exists today in [Text] needs
to pull those dependencies.
Gilles
On 30 Jan 2017 5:53 pm, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
Le 30/01/2017 à 15:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
> I lean towards going with a single module out of simplicity
+1
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
