On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:49:49 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
Shouldn't [numbers] focus only on number structures (fractions,
complex)
and the basic operations on them?
Strictly speaking, yes; but I'm trying to fit more in it than just
the obvious, so as to not require many new components (although I'd
prefer that way).
I'm not sure the solvers fit in the scope.
I'm also not sure.
Ideally, it should be another light-weight component (because solvers
are used in so many areas).
This thread is about if (and how) we can try and stretch the scope a
little, so as to group several basic utilities in a single component.
Gilles
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/01/2017 à 02:17, Gilles a écrit :
Hi.
Anyone has a statement about it?
Functionalities that are candidates to be moved from "Math"
to "Numbers":
* FastMath
* CombinatoricsUtils [1]
* ContinuedFraction [1]
* special functions [1]
* solvers
* MathArrays [2]
* MathUtils [1]
* ...
Thanks,
Gilles
[1] With redesigned API (e.g. to allow usage as Java8 functional
interface).
[2] Partly (e.g. "linearCombination").
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
