I am voting +1 Отправлено с iPhone
> 11 дек. 2016 г., в 8:11, Gilles <[email protected]> написал(а): > >> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:22:30 +0100, Gilles wrote: >> Hi. >> >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC6). >> >> >> Tag name: >> RNG_1_0_RC6 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') >> >> Tag URL: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=4581a4520315657a4219b37c81f5db80e4a4e43c >> >> Commit ID the tag points at: >> 4581a4520315657a4219b37c81f5db80e4a4e43c >> >> Site: >> http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC6-site >> >> Distribution files (committed at revision 17284): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rng/ >> >> Distribution files hashes (SHA1): >> c5e70a523160ed848194eeba0efa2b14d23c7a61 commons-rng-1.0-bin.tar.gz.sha1 >> 66d7701afc90aafa4c4b6e033b8df6cd84365161 commons-rng-1.0-bin.zip.sha1 >> ef56543c8882a0e4771de83ecf8b3be190f122cf commons-rng-1.0-src.tar.gz.sha1 >> 3dc56b0793d8bbd703a4efa68547eb58f6fb5b35 commons-rng-1.0-src.zip.sha1 >> >> KEYS file to check signatures: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS >> >> Maven artifacts: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1229/ >> >> Please select one of the following options[1]: >> [ ] +1 Release it. >> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care. >> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ... >> [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ... >> >> This vote will be open at least 72 hours, i.e. until 2016-12-10T00:00:00Z >> (this is UTC time). >> ---------- > > Ping? > > Unless I'm mistaken, after 100 hours have elapsed, there are only > 2 votes for RC6. > The only change wrt RC5 is that the (single) problem, reported by > Oliver, has been fixed. > > Please share your opinion about releasing[1] this new component, > especially since RC6 has gone a long way to satisfy requests[2] > that were not part of my initial plan.[3] > > > Thanks, > Gilles > > [1] RC1, 2 and 5 each had more than the three required votes... > [For RC3 and 4, I stopped the RM process before getting to > the vote.] > [2] Cf. long discussion(s) threads about modularization, utilities > (sampling and shuffling), versioning. > [3] In a RERO view, the stated scope should have been sufficient > to release the actual code at least 3 months ago (even much > earlier, given that the development occurred under public > scrutiny for more than a year now). > >> >> Regards, >> Gilles >> >> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
