> -----Original Message----- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 08:50 > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0 > > Hi Gilles, > > Gilles wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Gilles wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks, > >>> waiting for additional implementations. > >> > >> Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-) > > > > I'll do (the deadline was over anyways). > > The deadline just means that you wait to close the vote "at least" > until. [orcmid]
I think it is the vote will be *open* "at least until." It is common to leave a [VOTE] open either because of discussion or to see if an additional ballot is forthcoming. I've started using "ending no earlier than <some-UTC-datetime>" in [VOTE]s I run. I suppose the way [VOTE] threads end clearly is either with a [CANCEL] report or a [RESULT] report. > > Cheers, > Jörg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
