On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Once a branch has been merged into master, I think it is OK to remove it. > Otherwise, IMO it's on a case by case basis: Does the author of the branch > need it?
Whats the point? I'd rather see us create something like branches/archived and move such branches below. Basically same effect, but provides accessibility. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
