Passed our Daikon testing.
+1

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 2:04 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8
> 
> Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> schrieb am So., 10. Juli 2016 um
> 22:57 Uhr:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > hopefully the final RC for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 :-)
> > Changes since RC7:
> >
> > - fixed failing build on Windows plattforms
> > - corrected fix for BCEL-262
> >
> > Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 is available for review here:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel (rev 14344)
> >
> 
> Sorry the revision is incorrect. The correct revision is 14346.
> 
> 
> >
> > The tag is here:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_R
> C8
> >  (rev 1752118)
> >
> > Maven artifacts:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-
> 11
> > 83/org/apache/bcel/bcel/6.0/
> >
> > Maven artifact hashes:
> >
> > bcel-6.0-test-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: 30ba969d603b676929b69228ad0f2a4fc1c9c830)
> > bcel-6.0.pom
> > (SHA1: aff6c560d92df15a207247c5b0293bb734389094)
> > bcel-6.0.jar
> > (SHA1: 7d08bcac4832f81467d3e2ca5bd58ad627288656)
> > bcel-6.0-tests.jar
> > (SHA1: 3536d25398f6f6ac22deb9e446515056191661f7)
> > bcel-6.0-javadoc.jar
> > (SHA1: e47a109aa7416329a9970f0900136cb355af8ac8)
> > bcel-6.0-sources.jar
> > (SHA1: 206dfd32271b9b0150d8211070e5dbbe69cf5154)
> >
> > I've tested with Java 7 & 8 using Maven 3.3.9
> >
> > Details of changes since 5.2 are in the release notes:
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/bcel//RELEASE-
> NOTES.txt
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC8/changes-
> report.ht
> > ml
> >
> > Site:
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC8
> > (note some *relative* links are broken and the 6.0 directories are not
> > yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> >
> > Clirr Report (compared to 5.2):
> >
> > http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC8/clirr-report.html
> >
> > Note that Clirr reports several errors.
> > These are considered OK for the reasons stated below.
> > These exceptions are also noted in the Changes and Release Notes.
> >
> > Errors reported:
> > - methods added to org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface: OK
> > because that does not affect binary compatibility.
> > - Removed java.io.Serializable from all classes: OK, because we don't
> > expect anybody to rely on serialization for BCEL classes
> > - Return type of method 'public java.lang.Object getElementAt(int)'
> > has been changed to java.lang.String in class
> org.apache.bcel.verifier.VerifierFactoryListModel:
> > OK, because this class is part of an UI application and for this
> > reason should only used by Swing.
> >
> > RAT Report:
> >   http://home.apache.org/~britter/commons/bcel/6.0-RC8/rat-report.html
> >
> > KEYS:
> >   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no
> > sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. sometime after 23:00 CEST 13-July
> > 2016
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> > Thank you!
> > Benedikt
> >
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to