On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:34:47 -0500, Brent Worden wrote:
One previous thread on the subject:
http://markmail.org/message/u7lcxd6ye6qnesku
The final sentence of that thread:
"So I do not see Fraction as the foundation for anything really.
It stands on its own nicely IMO."
What more adequate conclusion would be than to have a standalone
Commons component?
[And the majority of the thread participants seemed to agree.
Yet the inertia prevailed.]
Gilles
Brent
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Brent Worden
<brent.wor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Somewhere in the mailing list archives is a discussion around this
very
topic. It was quite some time ago so I do not recall the reasoning
for
keeping both at that time. I will try sifting through the archives
to find
the thread if I find time.
Brent
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Ralph Goers
<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Gilles
<gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
>
>> Is it a complete overlap with what is in CM's package
>> "o.a.c.m.fraction"?
>> Should one be dropped in favour of the other?
>
> *Can* we drop either, while maintaining BC?
Why wouldn’t you be able to. The user would be able to continue
using the
old version if the need it.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
