On 25 June 2016 at 14:48, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is not an argument for a separate list. >> If MATH had had its own list, we would have been even less likely to notice. > > No, it isn't. But it contradicts the impression, that there is no need > for change, because we have dev@.
Whatever list is used, there's always a chance that problems will be ovelooked. Maybe even more so if the only people following the list are the ones involved, as would have been the case for a Math TLP. > Jochen > > > -- > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
