On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:25 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we are all agreed that it's not a problem that the classes no > longer implement Serializable. > > I did a Clirr run with just the Serializable errors suppressed, and it > now looks quite reasonable[1]. > > I think it would make sense to release that as the Clirr report, and > make sure that the changes/release-notes cover all the remaining error > reports. i.e. I think we should not suppress the other errors. >
+1 to the report and to full disclosure. Gary > > [1] http://home.apache.org/~sebb/BCEL/clirr-report.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
