On 22/06/2016 19:04, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> From the Peanut Gallery,
> 
> All of this discussion on (too many at once) [VOTE] threads suggest to me 
> that the [VOTE]s are premature.  
> 
> I don't understand the inclination to conduct [VOTE]s here that are at best 
> straw votes and generally serve to establish that there is no consensus 
> because of all the qualifications that are placed on the few [VOTE]s that are 
> apparently cast in the blur of discussions.
> 
> I think the key matter is that there is not enough discussion to tease out 
> consensus and even find opportunities for lazy consensus.  Then a [VOTE] 
> becomes a formal ratification in those rare cases where such a thing is 
> required (e.g., to back up a personnel action or take a resolution to the 
> Board).
> 
> I think these discussions about clustering/splitting the Commons Math 
> components are very useful and interesting to observe.  The use of [VOTE] is 
> worrisome and apparently useless other than for the attention it evokes.

+1

I have a very similar impression.

Mark


> 
>  - Dennis
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 08:30
>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] New component: Rational numbers
>>
> [ ... ]
>>
>> This (and new components VOTE thread) paints a more confusing picture
>> than
>> before to me.
>>
>> You are proposing to organize code into Commons Component/possible
>> TLP/Attic/Something based on the current knowledge of some participants,
>> including yourself, and I am grateful that you've been doing all this
>> work.
>> Part of me wants to stay out of the way and let the do-o-cracy play out
>> but
>> another part really feels this will be counter productive in the end
>> (not
>> to mention a lot of busy work.)
>>
>> As was mentioned by someone else before, people come and go, with
>> different
>> levels of expertise.
>>
>> For me, the keep-it-simple principle, not to mention least surprise says
>> to
>> keep whole the pile in one place, in Commons or as a TLP, either way.
>> Whether we use more than one Maven module here or as a TLP is a
>> different
>> matter and not relevant to the residence of the code base. We have other
>> Commons component that have multiple modules, no big deal.
>>
>> Gary
> [ ... ]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to