On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Maybe. That could depend on whether there is anyone at Commons that would > want to participate in the component. Another option is to follow the pattern > used by httpclient. I believe they took the last version of commons > httpclient and left a pointer to it in their new web site. But what followed > as a TLP was completely different and wasn’t binary compatible. The community > seemed to be completely fine with that. Quite right. But I definitely cannot imagine anyone desiring three development lines (Hipparchus, a fork outside Commons, and a component inside). Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
