Hi, James Carman wrote:
> Agree we should have a "source of truth". Is there something wrong with > using an "internal" or "impl" package name? The bundle plugin for OSGi > doesn't export these by default, which would be a nice side effect! :). While it is a step in the right direction, a package scoped solution does not solve the problem of a public interface that should not be implemented directly (as we've seen with the BCEL visitor). Time for Java 8 and its default implementations ... Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
