https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-256 is created and commented to track this.
If we think this analysis makes sense, we will choose to go ECCN 5D002 self-classify category. Will wait for a few days for feedbacks. Regards, Haifeng -----Original Message----- From: Chen, Haifeng [mailto:haifeng.c...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:57 PM To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: RE: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons? Thanks Stian and Benedikt! > Let's create a Jira issue to track the categorisation process. Do you mean to create a JIRA in LEGAL similar to LEGAL-250 to track this? Regards, Haifeng -----Original Message----- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:36 PM To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons? Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um 09:34 Uhr: > On 23 May 2016 3:42 a.m., "Chen, Haifeng" <haifeng.c...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > So how about we go to the process of ECCN 5D002 self-classify > > category > and registration like Taverna did? > > Agree on your evaluation, so ECCN 5D002 is good. This makes things a > lot easier! :) > > Let's create a Jira issue to track the categorisation process. > +1! good work everybody. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
