I had just tried to make sure it was included in the build because I
assumed that it was meant to be released :)
It's becoming apparent that was inaccurate.
Ralph Goers wrote:
As I recall 2.0 did not really include sandbox as part of the release because
we didn’t want to officially support the sandbox components. They might have
been included in the source distribution though. But these emails make it sound
like it is exactly the opposite of what I would have expected.
Ralph
On May 2, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The "Download and Build" page is more suitable for developers than end
users (especially if it points to trunk, which is not voted on) so
should not be the primary download page.
Also there seem to be two identical copies of each of the non-Maven
release artifacts:
commons-vfs-2.1-bin
and
commons-vfs2-distribution-2.1-bin
etc.
Are they supposed to be the same? If not what is missing from one of them?
I have no idea. This is just what your build process did...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
