Also please include a link to the KEYS file, i.e. https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
Note that the standard download page is http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/download_vfs.html I think that should be in the site menu. The "Download and Build" page is more suitable for developers than end users (especially if it points to trunk, which is not voted on) so should not be the primary download page. Also there seem to be two identical copies of each of the non-Maven release artifacts: commons-vfs-2.1-bin and commons-vfs2-distribution-2.1-bin etc. Are they supposed to be the same? If not what is missing from one of them? On 2 May 2016 at 10:40, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 May 2016 at 05:28, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> Please consider the following for Apache Commons VFS2 version 2.1 (rc0). >> >> Maven repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1161 > > The e-mail should contain the hashes of the release items as the above > URL is transitory. > The hashes allow one to tie the released files back to the vote thread. > > They can be copied from the Nexus mail. > >> Artifacts: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/{binaries,source} > > Likewise here we include the revision id of the URL: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/ > > >> Staged site: >> http://home.apache.org/~elserj/commons/commons-vfs-2.1/index.html > > There's no Clirr report that I could find. > > Also the download page links to trunk rather than the specific tag. > >> All reports are available in the provided staged Maven site. JIRA-generated >> release notes are available in the dist.a.o "Artifacts" repository. Unit >> tests pass and the RC was built util JDK6. > > E-mail should really have URL to make it easy for reviewers. > >> The current code is available in branches/VFS-2.1 at r1741921. This is what >> will be copied to tags upon successful passing of this vote. > > Full URLs in e-mails please. > Also it should be a TAG not a branch, as it should be kept if the vote > is successful > >> This vote will be open for 72-hours, 2016/05/05 0500 UTC. >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts as version 2.1 >> [ ] 0 OK, but... >> [X] -1 I oppose these artifacts as version 2.1 because.. > > As above. > > No need necessarily to rebuild everything as most of the concerns > relate to the vote e-mail and the site. > e.g. you can rename the branch as a tag. > >> >> - Josh >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
