1. I don't understand the source of urgency here. If someone has a new algorithm they want to release to the general public, they can put it on github. It does not matter very much if a method is sitting in Apache (commons) Math on any particular schedule. It's not like adding a feature to some platform that has to be integrated to be useful. Of course, the 'Apache (commons) Math mark of quality' won't mean anything if there is a sudden shift to 'movement' as a guiding principle, so ironically the victory would be Pyrrhic.
2. JMH is the current gold standard of microbenchmark measurement. It gives meaningful results. If someone wants to claim that they have new code that has some particular performance on a micro scale, they should be eager to contribute a JMH benchmark; it's not much work. 3. Apache Math can only come into existence if the board is convinced that there is a community prepared to operated according to ASF principles. That means finding some way to collegially resolve disputes. There's always a trip to the incubator available. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
