Hello. Shall we go forward with the creation of a branch named "development", and stop committing to "master" (which, by convention, should only contain tags of released code)?
Shall we also adopt a convention for feature branches, like names that are prefixed with "f-" or "feature-", to make it visible that they are WIP to be merged in "development"? [IOW, as a reminder that those branches should not exist for a long time, and should be deleted after the merge.] Perhaps even clearer would be to attach a JIRA report number to the name, like "feature-MATH-1319", so that we do not forget to open a corresponding issue. Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
