Hi Jochen,
Thanks for your message. The difference between to two separate pools is that
in our framework we don't know exactly how many no of separate pool we might
require, it is not two, but can scale more than 10, 20 in production
environment and I think to have so many pools and that to we have to create
dynamically at runtime, not practical
If it was a sub pool, I can always create the sub pool based on demand at
runtime. Moreover we have few parameters for each sub pool to maintain a min
and max connection objects, which parameters can be different for each sub pool
and cannot be implemented while design as we do not know these value of these
parameters at design time.
Please let me know if this answers your question else let know
Regards
Krishnakumar
-----Original Message-----
From: Krishnakumar Parasuram
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:28 PM
To: Phil Steitz; dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: Maintain sub pools within Commons pool - is it possible
Hi Phil,
Thanks for your message. First , how do I respond to your message. I have
added the dev@commons.apache.org in this mail.
I am already using the keyedObjectPool, but the keyedObjectPool give me only
one level of grouping i.e if the Key->A then I can group all the connection for
A, but I need two levels of grouping i.e.
The ObjectManger1 will contain the connection for A,B,C... so with the existing
implementation if I query for the Key->A then I will get the connection under
ObjectManager1->A connection,
But my requirement is I want to have groups like ObjectManager1 with A,B,C ...
and
ObjectManaer2 with A,B,C ...
ObjectManager3 with A,B,C and so on
So when I request for a connection for A, I have the option to choose the A
from ObjectManager1, ObjectManager2, or ObjectManager3 by selecting
ObjectManagerX.
Is this kind of implementation possible?
Regards
Krishnakumar
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 7:10 PM
To: Krishnakumar Parasuram
Subject: Re: FW: Maintain sub pools within Commons pool - is it possible
Hi Krishnakumar,
I just moderated through and responded to this message on
dev@commons.apache.org.
Please subscribe to the list so that you can see the responses and so that your
posts do not require moderation. Also, your question, while welcome, really
belongs on the user list - u...@commons.apache.org
Welcome to Commons!
Phil
On 1/28/16 12:45 AM, Krishnakumar Parasuram wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Krishnakumar Parasuram
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:14 PM
> *To:* dev@commons.apache.org; dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> *Subject:* Maintain sub pools within Commons pool - is it possible
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> We are using Apache commons pool 2.2 for pooling connection object to
> connect between our REST framework to Siebel Server.
>
>
>
> Everything works fine for what I have implemented. But I want to
> enhance this framework. The existing implementation maintains the
> connection object for a particular group called ObjectManger1.
> Now I want to maintain the connection for multiple groups like
> ObjectManager1, ObjectManager2 . and so on. Is it possible to
> implement this kind using commons pool.
>
>
>
> I want a subpool to be maintained for each ObjectManager_x within the
> commons pool
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Krishnakumar
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
