Hi there,

I've just noticed there could be a wrong backport commit done in MATH_3_X:

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=commitdiff;h=c9c252bf26165e7fafd093cd892af35b23aa8f3f

This backport commit was discussed with Luc Maisonobe in this mailing
list in the thread about "releasing 3.6". Luc agreed that changes
introduced by MATH-1300, 1304 and 1305 could be backported into 3.6.

But this backport commit was done differently and probably by a wrong
way. It misses all changes in the following file:
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/AbstractRandomGenerator.java

and probably some changes in this one too:
src/changes/changes.xml

it also seems changing the following file by a wrong way:
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/BitsStreamGenerator.java

After this commit the BitsStreamGenerator has a new public nextBytes()
method that I asked to add in MATH-1306 into both BitsStreamGenerator
and AbstractRandomGenerator classes.

On the one hand I'm happy that BitsStreamGenerator was changed as I
proposed in MATH-1300, 1304, 1305 and finally 1306 and a few comments
in 1307. But why AbstractRandomGenerator was not changed by the same
way? It looks like Gilles had confused with changes of MATH-1307 and
1308 after which AbstractRandomGenerator has just disappeared in the
master branch.

I also thought the additional nextBytes() method will not be accepted
for the backport into 3.6 because it introduces an API change. This is
why I didn't ask Luc about MATH-1306. However I think this change is
fully backward compatible whith the previous MC 3.x releases. If you
think so as well and this additional nextBytes() method can stay in
3.6 too, I would be just happy. But let's change the
AbstractRandomGenerator accordingly. I also suggest to add "@since
3.6" into the javadoc of this new method in both classes.

Happy New Year

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to