Le 30/12/2015 06:18, Ole Ersoy a écrit : > Hi, Hi Ole,
> > RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look > identical with the exception of a single @see Default... annotation > (Which I think is redundant...same as > All known implementing > classes...?). Would it make sense to remove the annotation and have one > RealMatrixChangingVisitor extend RealMatrixPreservingVisitor? No. They are different and used for different things. The visit method returns void in one case and double in another case. When it returns double, this double is used to update the matrix that is visited, hence the "Changing" nature of the visitor. best regards, Luc > > Cheers, > Ole > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
