> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:17:18 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Here is an idea that might break our deadlock re backward >>>>>> compatibility, versioning and RERO: >>>>>> >>>>>> Agree that odd numbered versions have stable APIs - basically >>>>>> adhere >>>>>> to Commons rules - no breaks within 3.0, 3.1, ..., 3.x... or 5.0, >>>>>> 5.1... but even-numbered lines can include breaks - >>>>>> >>>>> ...
This sounds awfully complicated for my puny human brain. It's bad enough that I have to remember how each FOSS project treats versions numbers, but having an exception within a Commons component is even worse. This is a non-starter for me. Gary
