[x] -0 OK, but… … on going over Incubator instead. It gives the chance to grow up a community and re-invite the code and documentation.
I’m with Benedikt pointing to the rock-star-thing and people behind the ASF. Why not use the Incubator as described by the ASF[1]? [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#incubator mit freundlichen Grüßen Uwe Barthel -- bart...@x-reizend.de > On 30 Oct 2015, at 01:42, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for > review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes > from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will > execute a software grant with the authors and use the code as the > basis for a new Commons Sandbox component. > > This VOTE will close in 72 hours. More discussion on the code and > its fit in Commons is always welcome, but please do not reply to > this thread with discussion, other than embedded justification for > negative VOTES. Use the thread from [1] instead. > > Git commands to grab the code: > > git clone g...@github.com:NormanShapiro/Naomi.git > git checkout gh-pages > > Thanks! > > Phil > [1] http://markmail.org/message/imoi5aipf63f7rsa > > [ ] +1 Yes! > [ ] +0 OK... > [ ] -0 OK, but... > [ ] -1 We should not do this, because... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
