So is this a global decision, should we drop ant support for all Commons components? I think there are only a few still maintaining an ant build, and there is no guarantee that these build.xml files are up-to-date.
Oliver Am 19.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb James Carman: > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:39 AM Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > >> 2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de>: >> >>>>> I thought it was being used to create Debian packages. >>>> >>>> If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant >>>> build file to explain this requirement. >>> >>> >>> Haven't looked at the build script. >>> But maybe you could keep only that part producing the Debian packages and >>> use Maven ant-run for including that. >>> >> >> TBH I don't see why Apache Commons should do that. If the Debain Project >> wishes to use a build system different from what Commons is using, they >> should take care of maintaining it. >> >> Regards, >> Benedikt >> >> >>> >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/ >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter >> http://github.com/britter >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
