Hi Bernd,
Let me look into this.
Rgds,Rory
On 18/07/2015 04:19, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello Rory and JDK team,
I know I repeat myself and you might not have influence on the process,
but it is really annoying that not a single of the Bug links I have
tried in the change notes document actually works (i.e. is not public).
Is it planned to do something about this?
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8076328
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8071931
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8067694
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8043201
etc
It might be understandable that you need to keep not-yet published
security bugs secret, but since the commits for those are (now) hitting
the EA repository I dont see a point in that anymore. (besides some of
the bugs are not even security bugs):
Better MBean connection:
http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8076397
Is this still the "contains any internal url we better hide the bug"
problem?
Speaking of security bugs, 8u51 includes a modified peer validation in
TLS/SSL which avoids to use reverse resolve the host names
(JDK-8067695). Is that part of 8u60 yet or will it be?
Gruss
Bernd
Am Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:03:32 +0100 schrieb "Rory O'Donnell"
<rory.odonn...@oracle.com>:
summary of changes are listed here.
<http://www.java.net/download/jdk8u60/changes/jdk8u60-b24.html>
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org