Just curious, how did this pass the staging test during the vote? Thanks
-D On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I burned the time I had last night trying to figure out what was going on > before I saw Grygorz' explanation and I have been out of pocket today. > Will not be able to get to this until toMorrow. > > > > > On May 28, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Since the bad jars are percolating through mirrors or have already done > so, > > I do not see another choice but releasing a 2.4.1. > > > > Gary > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, James Carman < > ja...@carmanconsulting.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:56 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Still needs a vote IMO. > >> Yes, if the binaries we voted on were actually corrupt and it wasn't > >> something that got corrupt during transfer, then we need to re-build the > >> binaries and re-vote on them. > > > > > > > > -- > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
