On 20 April 2015 at 04:25, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/19/15 6:52 AM, brit...@apache.org wrote:
>> SANDBOX-497 IP clearance for the names package
>>
>> Make clear that Commons Text only includes ported code from the
>> HumanNameParser PHP library.
>> HumanNameParser library is licensed under MIT.
>>
>>
>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo
>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/commit/db197ab1
>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/tree/db197ab1
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/diff/db197ab1
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: db197ab199281d65ca338f8f47b6099223a9cf8b
>> Parents: be2bcda
>> Author: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
>> Authored: Sun Apr 19 15:49:54 2015 +0200
>> Committer: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
>> Committed: Sun Apr 19 15:49:54 2015 +0200
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  NOTICE.txt | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/blob/db197ab1/NOTICE.txt
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> diff --git a/NOTICE.txt b/NOTICE.txt
>> index f6f4633..80d91a0 100644
>> --- a/NOTICE.txt
>> +++ b/NOTICE.txt
>> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ Copyright 2001-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>  This product includes software developed at
>>  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>
>> -This product includes software from the HumanNameParser.php
>> -(https://github.com/jasonpriem/HumanNameParser.php) library,
>> -under the Apache License 2.0 (see: the o.a.c.t.names package).
>> +This product includes software ported from the HumanNameParser PHP library
>> +(https://github.com/jasonpriem/HumanNameParser.php), which is licensed under
>> +the MIT License (MIT) (see: the o.a.c.t.names package).
>
> Sebb or some other license/notice expert can chime in here; but I
> suspect this is either not necessary or misplaced.  We were asked to
> rip out a lot of stuff like this from [math] NOTICE based on the
> argument that only legally required things should be in there.  If
> this is a legal requirement, the MIT license asks that you include
> the license, which should (IIUC) go in LICENSE, not NOTICE.  Given
> that this is a port and not inclusion, though; I am not sure it is
> needed.

I am not an expert in this, but I have read the docs [1] many times.

I agree with Phil that it does not seem necessary to update NOTICE in this case.

[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice

> Phil
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to