Odd way to use versions, imo. Sounds like "discussion" and "review patch" and "patch needed" tags would be the better tool.
Cheers, Paul On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Duncan Jones <djo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Currently the "Review Patch" fix version seems to be applied whenever > code has been supplied in an issue. This includes situations where > agreement hasn't yet been reached on fixing the issue and where the > supplied "patch" is minimal at best. > > I would prefer if we only use this marker on issues where the > discussions have already been completed and we've decided we want to > go ahead with the alteration/addition. > > Do others agree with this? If so, I'll edit existing issues to match > this. I then plan to try and clean up some of the "Discussion" items, > so that we either close them or move them to "Review Patch" or "Patch > Needed". > > Duncan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
