On 13 April 2015 at 19:21, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > 2015-04-13 2:27 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>: > >> +1 to what Peter said: it's a functional interface so it is >> lambda-compatible anyway. >> > > Well, yes it would be a functional interface, but it would lack all the > default methods defined in java.util.function.Predicate if we don't extend > it later.
Agreed, I was trying to get that point across with my last comment: >> > > public interface ThreadPredicate extends >> > java.util.function.Predicate<Thread> >> > >> > This change is useful once JDK-8 is the baseline, as it would only add >> > features (all of the default methods) from Predicate, not remove any >> > features or backwards compatibility. Cheers, Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
