Let's make it 3.5. I would like the new stuff to be available ASAP
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 04/09/2015 05:50 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:44:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>>> On 04/09/2015 11:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Trying to get back on work, after a while ... >>>> >>>> I have just fixed a very annoying (and difficult to reproduce) bug >>>> concerning BSP trees in 3.4.1. As I am on it, I will also try to >>>> fix MATH-1211 created recently. >>>> >>>> The bug I fixed is really important as it breaks some other tools, >>>> so I would need to release the fix officially as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> Therefore, I would like to publish a version 3.5 in the next few days. >>>> Of course, I will do the release management hurdle. What do you >>>> think about it? >>> >>> I see only one actual feature being added to 3.5 so far (the additional >>> method introduced to Descriptive and SummaryStatistics). >>> >>> We could copy the current 3_X branch to a 3_4_X branch and remove this >>> specific feature to really release a pure bugfix release for the 3.4 >>> branch. >> >> Alternatively, we could leave it (and I should add another similar before >> release)... >> Is there a practical reason that needs preserving the 3.5 option? > > not really imho, but it would be quite unusual for math to release > another minor release so quickly (and almost entirely consisting of > bugfixes). > > Thomas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
