Le 02/03/2015 23:21, ianmca86 a écrit : > i don't like the policy of changing the package name to make a tiny change > to binary compatibility. it makes it impossible to release often
And users don't like having deep conflicting libraries in their dependency tree :) > but we're getting way off base. my question is the same as ben's which was > never answered. can we check in the patch for 209 and then release a new > version? There are other important issues besides BCEL-209, the LVTT issues should be fixed for example if we want to claim Java 5 support. If your company needs a BCEL version compatible with Java 8 you can compile the version from the 6.0-RC3 tag, it isn't perfect but still better than the latest stable release. Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
