> Concerning [Math], when the possibility was raised, the majority > thought that development within Commons had practical advantages > (through shared burden of the development environment). > > I'm stating again the fact that nobody is involved in a "Commons" > project programming-wise; hence it does not make sense, in principle, > to have to share the programming discussions on the same ML.
The conclusion you derive from the fact is only an opinion though. Maybe it does make sense for others to hear what's going on in Math? ...and be it just for the board reports? > If it did, all the Apache (programming) project could as well share > the same list. [We'd just have to set up filters, wouldn't we?] That comparison is pretty flawed as those projects are not tiny components. I've never a great fan of umbrellas but the components are so small - I don't see another option. The thought of components to go TLP feels just plain silly to me. Hence it would be great to work together as a community that takes care of those components. While from a practical standpoint (if everyone filters anyway) you might be right, my guess is that a community with many list will not have the same feeling of affiliation. cheers, Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
