On 10 January 2015 at 14:13, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've not seen any development activity over the past few days, so I'm
> assuming that 1.4.1 RC 3 can now be rolled out (which I will do tomorrow)

Yes, sorry, should have said I had finished.

I've not checked Clirr, but I don't think I changed anything that
would affect that.

> Benedikt
>
> 2015-01-06 12:19 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Just realised there are some issues with the IDN changes I added.
>>
>> 1) Maximum Length checking. This is currently done become conversion
>> to punycode.
>> It occurs to me that sites presumably need to be equally reachable by
>> both punycode and Unicode URLs, so the maximum length check should
>> come after conversion
>> Further, the label length checking is done after conversion already
>>
>> 2) URL validation only converts http(s) URLs to punycode, but
>> presumably should convert domains for all schemes?
>>
>> Will fix 1 now; 2 will take longer.
>>
>>
>> On 6 January 2015 at 00:39, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 6 January 2015 at 00:30, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi all,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to
>> sebb)
>> >>> and
>> >>> > my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC3.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, I think it is in a stable state.
>> >>> I have been checking the source with Java 1.4 on a Windows VM and it
>> >>> passes.
>> >>>
>> >>> > If there is something left you would like to add, then please let me
>> >>> know.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm still wondering about VALIDATOR-235 - allowing IDN names.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've just updated the issue with two possible approaches.
>> >>>
>> >>> Assuming we want to do it at all, I favour the reflection approach, as
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Bleh. Let's cut 1.4.1 ASAP, then update the platform requirement to
>> Java 6
>> >> and put out a 1.5.
>> >
>> > Yes, that is the plan.
>> >
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> it is likely the one we would take if the code needed 1.6.
>> >>> When the minimum of Java 1.6 is reached, the reflection code can
>> >>> simply be removed.
>> >>> If the code checks for non-ASCII content first, the reflection code
>> >>> won't be used unnecessarily.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll look into this shortly, but wait for confirmation before
>> committing.
>> >>>
>> >>> > Otherwise I'll cut RC3 tonight or tomorrow.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> > Regards,
>> >>> > Benedikt
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
>> >>> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
>> >>> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
>> >>> > http://github.com/britter
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to