On 3 January 2015 at 12:34, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
>
> 2015-01-03 4:35 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I've made quite a bit of progress.
>>
>> However the IANA text file merges all the TLDs into one file - there
>> is no indication of whether the TLD is a country code or not.
>> This does not matter for ASCII codes, because they are easy to recognise.
>> Unfortunately it looks as though the only way to distinguish them is
>> to scan the HTML version of the file and check the Type column.
>> Not sure it is possible to automate this without a lot of work, so it
>> may take a bit longer that I had hoped.
>>
>
> No problem. Is there anything we can do to help you?

Turns out that the html format is not all that hard to parse, as it
appears to be auto generated.
I have now got it working so it creates separate sorted lists of
missing general and cc entries with comments.

I will commit the missing entries shortly.

There are still a couple of issues I think it would be good to resolve:
1) root, um and yu are not in the txt list. I think they should be
dropped (VALIDATOR-350)
2) lists are now already sorted, and there are unit tests to check
this, so I think we could drop the static{} block (VALIDATOR-349)

WDYT?

> Benedikt
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 2 January 2015 at 14:47, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > this vote in canceled to fix the problems discovered by sebb.
>> > I will waint until the XN-- entries are added before I roll out a new RC.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Benedikt
>> >
>> > 2015-01-01 19:02 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> we have fixed the issues which where found in RC1 so I'd like to call a
>> >> new vote to release Apache Commons Validator based on RC2.
>> >>
>> >> Changes from RC1:
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-307] - isValid checks if the given address is only IPV4
>> >> address and not IPV6
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-347] - toLowerCase() method is Locale-sensitive and should
>> >> not be used
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-348] - Update TLD list to latest version (Version
>> 2014123000)
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-336] - CUSIPCheckDigit thinks invalid CUSIP is valid.
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-345] - ISINCheckDigit fails to reject invalid (non-numeric)
>> >> check digits
>> >> - [VALIDATOR-346] - SedolCheckDigit fails to reject invalid
>> (non-numeric)
>> >> check digits
>> >> - Removed STATUS.html
>> >> - Added README.md to binary and source distribution
>> >> - Fixed encoding of source files in build by setting commons.encoding
>> >> property
>> >> - Fixed JIRA report to contain the issues of the project
>> >> - Reverted dependency to commons-beanutils to 1.8.3 since this is the
>> >> latest JDK 1.4 compatible release
>> >> - Added JDK requirements to release notes.
>> >>
>> >> Validator 1.4.1-RC2 is available for review here:
>> >>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/validator/ (svn
>> revision
>> >> 7629)
>> >>
>> >> The tag is here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_1_RC2/
>> >> (svn revision 1648888)
>> >>
>> >> Maven artifacts are here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1073/commons-validator/commons-validator/1.4.1/
>> >>
>> >> Details of changes since 1.4 are in the release notes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/validator/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>> >>
>> >> I have tested this with JDK 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 using maven 3.2.5.
>> >>
>> >> Site (some links my be broken but will be fixed when the site is
>> deployed):
>> >>   http://people.apache.org/~britter/validator-1.4.1-RC2/
>> >>
>> >> Clirr Report:
>> >>
>> http://people.apache.org/~britter/validator-1.4.1-RC2/clirr-report.html
>> >>
>> >> RAT Report:
>> >>   http://people.apache.org/~britter/validator-1.4.1-RC2/rat-report.html
>> >>
>> >> Keys:
>> >>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Please review this release candidate and vote.
>> >> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after
>> >> 2015/01/04 19:00CET
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>> >> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>> >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>> >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Benedikt
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
>> >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
>> >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
>> >> http://github.com/britter
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
>> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
>> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
>> > http://github.com/britter
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to