On 12/16/14 2:10 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can we consider MATH-1173 is solved,
Not sure.  Gilles asked for review.  Has anyone had a careful look?
>  and postpone MATH-1146,
Fixed.
>  MATH-1153
> (I was not able to integrate the patch without breaking other tests)
Per comments on the ticket, I will have a look at 1153 tonight, but
if the homogeneity tests are really failing, I think we should hold it.
> ,
> MATH-1158 (I don' tunderstand from the discussion if the patch
> completely breaks compatibility or if part of it can be applied),

+1 to postpone (I am still in the WONTFIX camp on this one)
> MATH-1172 (which has both a target at 3.4 and 4.0)

+1 to postpone
> , and MATH-1176 (until
> deeper analysis is performed about this being a real problem or being
> numerical noise)?
+1 to postpone
>
> I would like to start release candidate tomorrow.

Sounds good, though this whole RC-threatening process has really
improved productivity - he he.

Phil
>
> best regards,
> Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
> .
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to